I'm a Boomer and I don't remember anyone being worried about what I wanted out of work. I remember being concerned about getting a job and keeping a job. I remember being concerned about how to navigate obvious sexism before we called it that. I remember seeing women managers in engineering organizations do their best to hide their femininity and be one of the guys to the best of their abilities, even if they, even then, also wanted work-life balance and job security.
So I find this fascination about Gen Z, well, fascinating. It feels a bit like the tail wagging the dog and yet, I kind of get it. The work world is changing. Absolutely. Even though there are a bunch of us old fogies hanging around the work place, apparently fumbling with our readers as we fumble with our smartphones, the concern is not about our future but the future and well-being of the generations that follow us and will take organizations to wherever they may go next. And that makes sense.
I think one of the many challenges of most organizations is finding balance between the older and the younger generations, and this isn't new either. The younger generations often have less patience or respect for the older generation because they think we don't get it, that we don't know stuff, that we aren't as nimble intellectually as they are. And some of that is true. So it's hard not to remind them that some of us were writing code on machines that had less memory than their smartphones and we had to be pretty nimble and clever to write programs that did wondrous new things at the time with such technology.
And the older generation has certain views of the younger generations that are often as misguided and ill-informed and prejudicial.
So here's the thing as I read and re-read that article. Most of us want work-life balance. What that looks like for any of us differs so I think it dangerous to make that generational. Plenty of us appreciate having flexible schedule and being able to work remotely. By the same token, we have to be as committed to the business and the organization as we want the organization to be committed to us. If we have mutual commitment and respect--within reason--an organization will be accommodating to keep good people who will then help make sure the work gets done.
Everyone wants job security, but everyone has to be realistic about that. As employers and employees demonstrate mutual respect and commitment, and as the work gets done and the business can grow or expand or do what it needs to do to continue to be in business, employees will have job security. But no organization can promise job security because stuff happens.
I was particularly intrigued by the career path item. That seems weird to me but perhaps it has to do with my own trajectory in that I pursued opportunities as they became available or was sometimes forced to reconsider. Just because a manager has a plan for developing any worker, Gen Z or otherwise, doesn't mean that will come to fruition. The business may change out of necessity or circumstance. The possibilities are many. The mentorship program is a great idea nonetheless. Such a program will help managers and colleagues discover talents and abilities of its employees which might change career path options. If nothing else, a mentorship program can help the employee figure out how to navigate the options and opportunities in any organization, small or large.
I think the most fruitful phrase in this whole article is this one in the last paragraph: "avoid the negative stereotypes."
True for all age groups, all genders, all everything.